Blackring: Programmable Smart Ring Platform

Vibe-coding wearable hardware · Market assessment for Eric San · Solo founder
8 February 2026

Eric wants to build Blackring — a platform that sits atop commoditized OEM smart ring hardware sourced from Shenzhen, adding a software SDK (delivered as an AI-coding-tool “rule” for Cursor, Lovable, Claude Code) that lets vibe coders program arbitrary applications on wearable hardware. The ring costs US$20–35 from the OEM; Blackring would sell it at US$120–150 with the SDK included. The community of vibe coders sharing ring “recipes” (gesture controls, smart-home automation, party games) is the flywheel.

AI Smart Ring Mkt
US$318M–1.3B
2024, sources disagree12
Smart Home Hubs
US$40B
→ US$79B by 20303
Maker/Dev HW
US$2–3B
RPi, Arduino, ESP326
Addressable TAM
US$8–18M
Yr 1–3, bottom-up

I. Founder Context

Eric San — Solo Technical Founder
Builder Bandwidth risk Based in Hong Kong. Previously Uber (driver onboarding), then Pickupp (operations → tech/product across HK, SG, KL, HCMC). Now building GenieFriends (event ops) and Donna AI (WhatsApp assistant). Hardware tinkering: successfully reverse-engineered OEM ring BLE protocol, built SDK as Cursor/Lovable/Claude “rule” file. Previous startup: community-building platform. HK/Shenzhen proximity = supply chain advantage.20
Bandwidth crisis
  • 7+ active projects: Sourcy (part-time), Donna, Wenhao blue-collar AI, Blackring, OpenClaw, GenieFriends, consulting20
  • Build deficit at Day 4+. Daily reports show networking outpacing building since Feb 421
  • No co-founder. Solo on tech, ops, and distribution. Eric acknowledged he needs “someone who can bring the audience”22
Founder pain-point check (Phase 0 dog-food)

Does Eric have this problem firsthand? Partially yes. Eric is a vibe coder who tinkered with OEM ring hardware and found the experience frustrating — no SDK, no docs, BLE protocol undocumented. He built the SDK for himself. That’s a real signal. But the “pain” is niche: most vibe coders don’t own a ring and aren’t looking for one. This is “solution in search of a problem” territory unless a killer daily-use case emerges.


II. Market Sizing (Layered)

Layer 1 — Global Wearable Technology

The global wearable technology market was valued at ~US$186B in 2024, projected to reach US$390–440B by 2030 at 13–16% CAGR. Dominated by smartwatches (Apple Watch, Galaxy Watch) and earbuds (AirPods). Smart rings are the fastest-growing sub-segment.4

Layer 2 — Smart Ring Segment

Market reports disagree significantly on smart ring sizing, reflecting different category definitions:

Source2024 SizeForecastCAGRDefinition
Market.us1US$1.3BUS$11.3B (2034)24.6%“AI Ring” — broadest, includes all smart/AI features
IntelMarketResearch2US$318MUS$808M (2034)13%“AI Smart Ring” — narrower AI-specific
MarketDataForecast5US$30MUS$186M (2033)22.5%“Smart Ring” — very narrow (NFC/payment focus)
40× variance across sources

The widest estimate (US$1.3B) likely includes health-tracking rings like Oura + Samsung + Ultrahuman. The narrowest (US$30M) may only count NFC/payment rings. For Blackring’s purposes, the relevant number is the programmable/developer ring segment — which does not exist in any market report. This is a new category Blackring would create.

Layer 3 — Developer / Maker Hardware

The maker/developer hardware market (Arduino, Raspberry Pi, Adafruit, Seeed Studio, ESP32) represents ~US$2–3B annually. Raspberry Pi IPO’d in June 2024 on LSE at ~£630M market cap (~US$800M), with ~US$265M revenue and 60M+ cumulative boards sold.6 Arduino has sold 30M+ boards.7 ESP32 modules dominate IoT hobbyist projects at US$3–8/unit.

Layer 4 — Smart Home (Matter Protocol)

The smart home hub market is valued at US$40B (2024), projected US$79B by 2030 at 12% CAGR.3 Matter protocol (backed by Apple, Google, Amazon, Samsung) had 1,000+ certified devices by mid-2024 and is accelerating.8 A ring that controls Matter devices has genuine cross-market potential — but this is a different product than “programmable ring for vibe coders.”

Layer 5 — Addressable TAM (Blackring-Specific, Bottom-Up)

SegmentPopulationConv. %Rev/UserSegment $
Vibe coders (Cursor/Lovable/Bolt power users)~500K globally1–3%US$130US$0.7–2.0M
IoT / Maker hobbyists~5M globally0.3–0.8%US$130US$2.0–5.2M
Content-driven impulse (TikTok/YT viral)viral, variablevariesUS$130US$1–4M
Enterprise / B2B (warehouse, accessibility)TBDTBDUS$200+US$1–4M
Year 1–3 Addressable TAMUS$8–18M
Reality check: “Vibe coder hardware” is not a recognised market segment

No research firm tracks this category. The 500K vibe-coder estimate is derived from Cursor’s reported 1M+ users (late 2024)9 with heavy discounting for those who want hardware. Most vibe coders are pure-software. Converting 1–3% to buy a physical ring requires an exceptional content/demo pipeline. The US$8–18M is a first-principles estimate, not a market report number.

Regional TAM — Hong Kong / Greater China

Eric is based in HK with Shenzhen supply chain access. Asia-Pacific is the fastest-growing region for smart rings.2 However, the target audience (English-speaking vibe coders using Cursor/Lovable) is predominantly US/EU. HK’s advantage is supply-side (cheap manufacturing, fast iteration), not demand-side. GTM is inherently global-from-day-1.


III. Competitive Landscape

3a. Direct Smart Ring Competitors

None of these compete on programmability. They all sell locked-down health-tracking experiences. Blackring’s angle is orthogonal — but that also means there’s no proven demand for “programmable ring.”

CompanyHQFundingPriceModelThreat
OuraFinland~US$148M+ (Series C at US$2.55B val, 2022)10US$299–549Ring + US$5.99/mo subMedium
Samsung Galaxy RingKoreaCorporateUS$399Ring, no subscription11Medium
Ultrahuman Ring AirIndia~US$50M+ (Series B, 2024)12US$349Ring, no subLow
RingConnChinaUndisclosed (~US$10–20M est.)US$179–279Ring, freemium appLow
Amazfit Helio RingChinaCorporate (Zepp Health)US$199Ring onlyLow
Key insight: Oura’s moat is subscription, not hardware

Oura’s reported ~1M subscribers at US$5.99/mo = ~US$72M/yr in recurring revenue with ~80% gross margins on software, vs. ~50–65% on hardware. This is the business model Blackring lacks.10

3b. Playbook Dissection — Winners

CompanyModelScalePlaybookWhy It Doesn’t Apply
Oura10 Ring + subscription ~US$200M+ ARR est., US$2.55B val Celebrity endorsement (NBA, SV execs), health data moat, subscription lock-in Took 9 years and US$148M+. Required medical-grade R&D. Solo founder with no health pedigree can’t replicate.
Raspberry Pi6 Cheap board + open ecosystem ~US$265M rev, ~US$800M market cap (IPO 2024), 60M+ units Education-first. Community defines use cases. Ecosystem of accessories. Content/tutorials self-sustaining. Closest playbook — but RPi took 12 years to IPO and started as a non-profit foundation with academic backing, not a startup. The “open platform for cheap hardware” model works but requires extreme patience.
Pebble13 Smartwatch + developer SDK US$43M across Kickstarter campaigns, 2M+ users Crowdfunding pioneer. Developer-first ecosystem. Third-party apps. Acquired by Fitbit for ~US$23M (distressed, assets only). Even the best crowdfunded hardware company died against big tech. Pebble had 2M users and still couldn’t sustain.
Samsung Galaxy Ring11 Ring, no sub Corporate (Samsung Health ecosystem) Legitimised smart ring as mainstream form factor. Galaxy Unpacked July 2024. Samsung’s entry proves category viability but also means a trillion-dollar competitor now owns the “mainstream ring” position. Startup must find a wedge Samsung won’t bother with.

3c. Failed Examples (Graveyard)

CompanyRaisedProductWhat Killed ItLesson for Blackring
Ringly (2014–2019)14 ~US$5.1M Fashion-forward notification ring Notifications = feature, not product. Apple Watch ate their lunch. No recurring revenue. Don’t compete on features bigger players absorb. The “platform” angle is more defensible — but only if the community materializes.
Nod Ring (2014)15 ~US$700–890K (Kickstarter) Gesture-control ring 2014 hardware not ready. BLE too slow. Gesture recognition too primitive. Terrible reviews. Most relevant cautionary tale. Gesture rings failed in 2014 due to hardware limits. In 2026, hardware is better — but the “cool demo, no daily use case” problem may persist.
Logbar Ring (2014)16 ~US$880K (Kickstarter) Gesture-control ring (Japan) Same as Nod. Product felt like a toy. No developer ecosystem. Both Nod and Logbar show that gesture hardware without a clear workflow = novelty product.
Motiv Ring (2016–2020)17 ~US$8–12M Fitness-tracking ring Couldn’t compete with Oura on health metrics. No subscription. Acqui-hired by Proxy (access control). Health-tracking ring without subscription = race to the bottom. Blackring’s community/platform model avoids this — if the community materializes.
Humane AI Pin (2024)18 US$230M+ Wearable AI assistant (US$700 + US$24/mo) Brutal reviews. No clear daily use case. “AI inside” isn’t enough without utility. Seeking sale. Most important 2024 failure signal. Even US$230M couldn’t make “AI wearable without clear use case” work. Blackring must have a daily use case.
The hardware death pattern

Nod, Logbar, Ringly, Motiv, Humane — all built hardware for a use case that didn’t stick. The pattern: (1) cool demo, (2) viral crowdfunding, (3) mediocre daily usage, (4) churn/returns, (5) death. Blackring’s thesis must break this pattern by having the community find the daily use case, rather than pre-defining it. But that’s also a risk: what if the community doesn’t find one?


IV. Unit Economics

Ring P&L (Per Unit)

Line ItemBlackring (Est.)Oura (Benchmark)10
Retail PriceUS$120–150US$299–549
OEM COGSUS$20–35US$80–120 (in-house mfg)
Shipping + PackagingUS$8–15US$10–15
Platform/Payment Fees (Shopify/Stripe ~5%)US$6–8US$15–27
Returns/Warranty (est. 8–12%)US$10–18US$24–66
Gross Profit / UnitUS$44–74US$150–321
Gross Margin37–49%50–58% (hw only)
Gross Profit/Ring
~US$59
midpoint estimate
Est. CAC
US$30–80
content-led, variable
LTV (no sub)
US$59
one-time
LTV:CAC
0.7–2.0×
fragile
Death metric: LTV ≈ CAC without subscription

Without recurring revenue, LTV equals first-purchase gross profit (~US$59). If CAC rises above ~US$50 (inevitable once organic content plateaus), unit economics become negative. Oura’s LTV with subscription: ~US$59 (hw) + US$72/yr (sub) × 3yr avg = ~US$275. Their CAC of ~US$100–150 works because LTV is 2–3× CAC.10

The one cost that could blow up gross margin: Returns. OEM rings have no brand-quality consistency. If return rates hit 15–20% (vs. assumed 8–12%), gross margin drops from ~43% to ~28%. Hardware returns include shipping both ways + restocking loss.

Break-Even Scenarios

Hobby (self-fund)
~420 units / US$55K
Small biz (1 FTE)
~3,000 units / US$390K
VC-scale (team of 5)
~15,000 units / US$1.95M

Initial capital: HK$500K (~US$64K). At hobby pace, break-even at ~420 units. Net margin is thin at every scale without subscription revenue.

Recurring revenue fix (non-negotiable)
  • Option A: Recipe marketplace — 30% take rate on paid community “recipes” (gesture packs, smart-home configs). Requires critical mass of builders.
  • Option B: SDK Pro tier — US$9–19/mo for commercial use, enterprise APIs, advanced BLE features.
  • Option C: Matter subscription — US$4.99/mo for cloud AI gesture processing + smart-home automations. This is the strongest recurring revenue path if pivoting to consumer smart-home control.

V. Live Signals

Web search tools experienced systematic failures during this session. Signals below are from established public data and Eric’s CRM. A Donna real-time sweep is recommended — see brief below.

SignalDirectionDetailSource
Vibe coding goes mainstream Bullish Andrej Karpathy coined term Feb 2025. Cursor 1M+ users by late 2024, growing rapidly.9 Public
Smart ring category explodes Bullish Samsung Galaxy Ring (Jul 2024) legitimised form factor.11 Apple rumoured for 2026/2027 ring. Google patent filings for “Pixel Ring.” Press
Matter protocol adoption Bullish 1,000+ certified devices by mid-2024. Apple, Google, Amazon, Samsung all backing.8 CSA
Gen Z smart ring interest Bullish 31% of smart ring inquiries in Q2 2024 from ages 16–24. 300% higher engagement with gesture controls.19 pmarketresearch
AI hardware hype peaking Mixed Humane AI Pin (US$700, failed).18 Rabbit R1 (US$199, mixed). Meta Ray-Ban (success). Market learning that AI hardware needs clear use case. Press
BLE hacking community Mixed GitHub repos for Oura/Whoop/Mi Band BLE have 500–2K+ stars. Tinkerer community exists but is small and niche. GitHub
Gesture ring graveyard Bearish Nod, Logbar, Fin, Myo Armband — all failed.1516 Gesture-as-input has never found consumer PMF. “Cool demo” problem persists. Crunchbase

VI. GTM Assessment (Founder-Contextualized)

Eric’s GTM Advantages

  • Content-native: “Watch me vibe-code a lie detector onto a US$15 ring” is inherently viral
  • Technical credibility: BLE cracked, SDK built. Not vaporware.
  • AI-native dev speed: Cursor + Claude = rapid SDK iteration
  • HK/Shenzhen proximity: Can visit OEM factories in person. Hardware sourcing advantage.20
  • Community builder: Previous startup was community-focused. Understands flywheel mechanics.
  • Low downside: HK$500K initial, break-even at 420 units.

Eric’s GTM Risks

  • Bandwidth crisis: 7+ projects, build deficit Day 4+. Blackring needs deep focus it’s not getting.21
  • Solo + no hardware ops: Inventory, returns, QC, logistics eat solo founders alive.
  • No distribution partner: Needs someone who can “bring the audience.” Ilona’s Lost Astronaut could fill this but equity terms unclear.22
  • Kickstarter risk: Crowdfunding hardware is high-stress. Delayed delivery = trust destroyed (Pebble pattern).13
  • No recurring revenue model: LTV ≈ CAC. Structural business model gap.
  • No defensibility: Another vibe coder can crack a different ring’s BLE in a week.

GTM Phases

PhaseTimelineGoalGate
0 · ValidateNow → Mar 2026Ship 50–100 rings to vibe coders. Get 10 people building.5+ community recipes shared publicly
1 · Content BlitzMar → Jun 202630 viral-format videos. Build waiting list.1,000+ waitlist, 3+ videos >100K views
2 · LaunchJun → Sep 2026Shopify or Kickstarter. First 1,000 units. Recurring revenue model live.US$100K+ revenue, 50%+ gross margin
3 · PlatformSep 2026 → Mar 2027Recipe marketplace. Matter integration. Second hardware (wristband).Subscription revenue live, 5K+ units cumulative
4 · Scale or PivotMar 2027+If PMF: raise seed. If not: pivot to B2B wearable SDK licensing.US$500K+ ARR or clear pivot signal

Government Grants (HK)

Hong Kong grants to investigate
  • HKSTP Ideation Programme: HK$100K grant + incubation for early-stage tech startups. Relevant if Blackring positions as “smart-home IoT.”
  • Cyberport Incubation Programme: Up to HK$500K financial assistance over 2 years. Digital tech focus.
  • ITC TSSSU: Up to HK$1.5M for university spin-offs (not applicable unless Eric affiliates with a uni).
  • BUD Fund: Up to HK$700K for branding/marketing in mainland China or ASEAN markets.

Donna should verify current application windows and eligibility criteria.


VII. Investor Assessment (Ilona / Lost Astronaut)

Ilona Bernotaite (Lost Astronaut) discussed €50K investment for Blackring.22 At 5–7% equity, that implies ~€700K–1M pre-money valuation.

Take the deal if:

  • Ilona brings distribution — content, audience, creator network. Not just capital.
  • €50K funds Phase 0 only — 100 rings, content production, community setup. Without touching Eric’s personal runway.
  • Clear milestone gate: If 100 beta users don’t generate 5+ community projects in 3 months, both sides walk.

Don’t take the deal if:

  • Ilona is just a check. If no distribution leverage, self-fund Phase 0 (HK$500K covers it) and don’t give up 5–7% equity.
  • Equity terms lock in high valuation. Pre-product, pre-revenue, pre-community — €1M pre-money is generous. If it creates friction for a future seed round, skip it.
  • Kids wearable proposal dilutes focus. Ilona proposed a kids wearable pivot22 — this is a different product, different market, different regulatory burden (COPPA). Don’t conflate.

VIII. Red Team

The Bear Case

  • Gesture ring graveyard is 10+ companies deep.1516 Not a single gesture-first ring has found PMF in 12 years of attempts.
  • Humane AI Pin burned US$230M18 on “AI wearable without clear use case” and is seeking a buyer. If they couldn’t make it work with that capital, can a solo founder?
  • “Vibe coder hardware” is a micro-niche. US$8–18M addressable TAM. Even at 100% capture, not a venture-scale business.
  • No defensibility. Another vibe coder can crack a different ring’s BLE in a week and create competing SDK rules. First-mover advantage in open-source communities is thin.
  • LTV ≈ CAC without subscription. The unit economics are structurally unprofitable at scale unless recurring revenue is added.
  • Eric is 15–20% on this across 7 projects. Hardware startups die without deep focus. Even Pebble (US$43M Kickstarter, 2M users) couldn’t survive against big tech.13
  • OEM quality risk. Shenzhen OEM rings have no brand consistency. Returns could be 15–20%, killing gross margin.

Steel-Man Counter-Arguments

  • We’re NOT building a gesture ring. Blackring is a platform — the community defines the use case. If gesture control doesn’t stick, Matter smart-home control, health data, or accessibility might.
  • We’re NOT Humane. US$120 vs. US$700. US$64K capital vs. US$230M burn. The downside is a weekend hobby gone wrong, not a corporate catastrophe.
  • Micro-niche can expand. Raspberry Pi started as “educational computer for UK schools” — a micro-niche. The community found the use cases (media servers, retro gaming, IoT). Same pattern could apply.6
  • SDK-as-Cursor-rule is genuinely novel. Nobody else packages hardware SDKs as AI coding tool extensions. This is a real innovation, even if small.
  • Timing convergence is real. Vibe coding + smart rings + Matter = three independent trends intersecting. This is rare.
  • Low burn = long runway. At HK$500K initial, Eric can run Phase 0–1 for 6–12 months without external capital. If no signal, walk away.
  • Content potential is high. “I coded X on a US$15 ring” is inherently shareable. Organic content could drive CAC to near-zero for early cohorts.

IX. Strategic Alternative

The strongest version of Blackring may not be “vibe coders programming rings”

It may be “Matter-native AI ring for smart home control” — a US$99–149 consumer product with US$4.99/mo subscription for cloud AI gesture processing + premium automations. This reframes the product as:

  • Universal smart-home remote — gestures control lights, locks, appliances via Matter8
  • AI-powered gesture learning — ring learns your gestures over time
  • Recurring revenue built in — US$4.99/mo solves the death metric
  • Dramatically larger TAM — smart home control (US$40B+3) vs. vibe-coder hardware (US$8–18M)

The vibe-coder community becomes the builder layer that creates integrations — not the primary customer. Leo Ho (investor contact) specifically suggested Matter protocol integration.23

X. Bottom Line

Verdict: B− — Conditionally interesting. High ceiling, fragile floor.

Blackring sits at a genuine intersection of three powerful trends: vibe coding, smart rings going mainstream, and Matter/smart-home convergence. The “Raspberry Pi for wearables” positioning is compelling in theory. But the thesis has three structural gaps that must close before committing significant capital or time.

What must be true:

1. A killer daily-use case must emerge from the community. Not “lie detector at parties.” Something people use every day — Matter smart-home control, health data ownership, or accessibility input. If no daily use case emerges from the first 100 users, that’s the pivot signal.
2. Recurring revenue must be built in by Phase 2. Recipe marketplace (30% take), SDK Pro (US$19/mo), or Matter subscription (US$4.99/mo). Without this, the business is a hardware reseller with thin margins and LTV ≈ CAC.
3. Eric must go 70%+ on Blackring by March 2026. Current 15–20% allocation across 7 projects won’t reach escape velocity. Either commit or keep it as a weekend hobby — the middle ground burns capital without results.21

If you insist on the current path: The minimum viable version is Phase 0 only — 50 rings, 10 vibe coders, content-first GTM, zero external capital. US$6–8K total investment. If 5+ community projects emerge in 3 months, proceed to Phase 1. If not, walk away with trivial sunk cost.

If a different path is better: Pivot from “vibe coder toy” to “Matter-native smart-home ring” with subscription. This expands TAM from US$8–18M to a slice of the US$40B+ smart-home market, solves recurring revenue, and positions against smart-home controllers rather than other smart rings. The vibe-coder community becomes the builder layer, not the customer.


XI. Self-Critique & Data Confidence

This report was built with degraded tooling — web search returned polluted results for the majority of queries. Below is an honest assessment of data confidence and corrections from the first draft:

Claim (v1)StatusCorrection
Smart ring segment US$4.5B by 2025WrongActual range: US$30M–1.3B depending on definition.125 Corrected.
Raspberry Pi IPO at US$6.4BWrongActual: ~£630M market cap (~US$800M).6 Corrected.
Oura US$250M+ raisedAdjusted~US$148M+ verifiable (Series C). Total may be higher with undisclosed rounds.10
Ultrahuman US$75M raisedAdjusted~US$50M+ verifiable (Series B 2024).12
Ringly US$8M raisedAdjusted~US$5.1M per Crunchbase.14
Pebble acquired for US$40MAdjusted~US$23M (asset acquisition, distressed).13
Gross margin 45–60%AdjustedRevised to 37–49% after more conservative return/warranty assumptions.
Addressable TAM US$12–18MAdjustedRevised to US$8–18M with lower vibe-coder conversion rate (1–3% vs. 2–4%).
Oura ~1M subscribers, ~US$200M ARRUnverifiedWidely reported in tech press but not from SEC filing. Oura is private. Donna should verify.
Matter 2,500+ devices by end 2025UnverifiedCSA reported 1,000+ by mid-2024.8 2,500+ is extrapolation. Donna should verify.
Cursor 2M+ usersUnverified1M+ reported late 2024.9 2M+ by Feb 2026 is plausible but unconfirmed.

References

Market reports

[1] Market.us, Global AI Ring Market 2025–2034 — US$1.3B (2024) → US$11.3B (2034), 24.6% CAGR. Broadest definition (“AI Ring”).
[2] IntelMarketResearch, AI Smart Ring Market 2026–2032 — US$318M (2024) → US$808M (2034), 13% CAGR. Narrower “AI Smart Ring” definition.
[3] DeepMarketInsights, Smart Home Hub Market 2025–2030 — US$40B (2024) → US$79B (2030), 12% CAGR. Includes gesture-control hubs.
[4] IDC Worldwide Wearables Tracker / Statista — Global wearable technology ~US$186B (2024). Widely cited across multiple sources.
[5] MarketDataForecast, Smart Ring Market — US$30M (2024) → US$186M (2033), 22.5% CAGR. Very narrow definition (NFC/payment focus).

Company benchmarks

[6] Raspberry Pi Holdings IPO Prospectus (LSE, June 2024) — ~£630M market cap, ~US$265M rev (2023), 60M+ boards sold cumulative. Foundation started 2012.
[7] Arduino company announcements — 30M+ boards sold (cumulative). Private company.
[8] Connectivity Standards Alliance, Matter Protocol — 1,000+ certified devices by mid-2024. Apple, Google, Amazon, Samsung backing.
[9] Cursor (Anysphere) — reported 1M+ users late 2024 — from company blog / press coverage. Growth trajectory suggests higher by Feb 2026 but unconfirmed.
[10] Oura Health — Series C May 2022 at US$2.55B valuation. ~US$148M+ total raised (Crunchbase). Ring price US$299–549, subscription US$5.99/mo. ~1M subscribers and ~US$200M ARR per tech press estimates (private, unaudited).
[11] Samsung Galaxy Ring — Launched Galaxy Unpacked July 2024. US$399 retail. No subscription. Samsung Health integration.
[12] Ultrahuman — India-based. Series B 2024, ~US$50M+ total raised. Ring Air US$349. No subscription.

Failed companies (graveyard)

[13] Pebble Technology — US$43M across 3 Kickstarter campaigns. 2M+ users. Acquired by Fitbit Dec 2016 for ~US$23M (assets/IP only, distressed).
[14] Ringly (2014–2019) — NYC smart ring. ~US$5.1M raised (Crunchbase). Shut down ~2019. Notifications → sleep tracker pivot failed.
[15] Nod Ring (2014) — Gesture-control ring. ~US$700–890K Kickstarter. Terrible reviews. Hardware too primitive for gesture recognition.
[16] Logbar Ring (2014) — Japanese gesture ring. ~US$880K Kickstarter. Same failure as Nod. Product felt like a toy.
[17] Motiv Ring (2016–2020) — Fitness ring. ~US$8–12M raised. Acqui-hired by Proxy (access control), 2020. IP absorbed.
[18] Humane AI Pin (2024) — US$230M+ raised. US$700 + US$24/mo. Brutal reviews. Seeking buyer. Most important recent AI hardware failure.

Live signals

[19] pmarketresearch, AI Smart Ring Market — 31% of Q2 2024 inquiries from ages 16–24. 300% higher engagement with gesture controls. Premium segment 60% of revenue.

Founder conversations & CRM data

[20] Eric’s CRM: crm/state/user.json — Current state, projects, bandwidth, principles.
[21] Eric’s CRM: crm/reports/2026-02-07.md, 2026-02-08.md — Daily reports showing build deficit Day 4+, 7+ active projects, networking > building imbalance.
[22] Investor call transcripts: crm/meetings/2026-01-29_investor_blackring.md, 2026-02-06_ilona_bernotaite_blackring_investor_call.md — Ilona/Lost Astronaut: €50K offer, kids wearable proposal, equity discussion.
[23] Eric’s CRM: crm/state/people.json — Leo Ho — Suggested Matter protocol integration for Blackring smart-home control angle.